Karen’s Defense

نویسندگان

چکیده

The final hurdle for all Ph.D. candidates in our department at the university was an oral defense of their thesis work. a formal report research project that had usually taken years to finish. Along way, they satisfy list course requirements, and knowledge should have learned these courses also fair game questioning by Advisory Committee faculty members who guided candidate over attended defense.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Defense Capabilities and the Defense Capabilities Initiative

One significant way in which the duplication issue has remained important emerged from the introduction of another factor. By the time of St. Mâlo and the first U.S. formal response to it, the NATO Alliance was also “seized of” concerns about its own military resources and capacities. Having successfully completed the design phase of adapting the NATO Alliance to meet the challenges of the post...

متن کامل

Defense Transformation and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review

A t the end of the Cold War, America entered a new and unfamiliar global security environment. As the Department of Defense began to alter strategies and plans, it quickly became apparent that changes might have to be made across the defense establishment. This led in 1993 to the Bottom-Up Review, and, starting in 1997, to the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) process. As the Department of Defen...

متن کامل

Optimal defense theory explains deviations from latitudinal herbivory defense hypothesis.

The latitudinal herbivory defense hypothesis (LHDH) postulates that the prevalence of species interactions, including herbivory, is greater at lower latitudes, leading to selection for increased levels of plant defense. While latitudinal defense clines may be caused by spatial variation in herbivore pressure, optimal defense theory predicts that clines could also be caused by ecogeographic vari...

متن کامل

In defense of definitions

The arguments of Fodor, Garrett, Walker and Parkes [(1980) Against definitions, Cognition, 8, 263-367] are the source of widespread skepticism in cognitive science about lexical semantic structure. Whereas the thesis that lexical items, and the concepts they express, have decompositional structure (i.e. have significant constituents) was at one time “one of those ideas that hardly anybody [in t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: IEEE Pulse

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2154-2287', '2154-2317']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mpuls.2023.3294105